The article I chose focused primarily on the initial set up of a Makerspace within the library. In summary, the article highlighted the need for appropriate space for a Makerspace area as well as the appropriate staff knowledge for running the day to day operations of the area. Crumpton also discusses two possible methods of funding and maintaining the equipment: fees and grants. Finally, he discusses the need for passing on fines to patrons if equipment is used incorrectly and fines are generated to the library (Crumpton A, 2015). He does recognize that need for technology to be more readily available and that the library is an appropriate place for this: "As part of the effort to broaden the appeal of enjoying library space and to participate in transformative learning activities, many libraries and museums are transforming part of their space into Makerspaces" (Crumpton A, 2015).
This idea of broadening the appeal of enjoying library space mirrors the 6th common belief that information technology should be integrated and equitably available. So while he does appear to be a proponent of a fee based structure to weed out the less serious patrons, he does also discuss ongoing grants as a method of maintaining the technology (Crumpton A, 2015). This idea of an ongoing grant would help make the technology more equitable. Until technology becomes less expensive, I believe there will continue to be challenges with making the use truly equitable. Even with a fee per use for something like a 3D printer, I think you will see less creativity and exploration if those without the resources are unable to tinker until they get it right.
References
Michael A Crumpton, (2015) "Fines, fees and funding: makerspaces standing apart", 